PS3’s GPU 40nm redesign results in reduced power consumption

Sony said that the PlayStation 3 Slim would result in the company finding profit on the system. Despite a $100 price drop, the console’s slim repackaging would not only let the hardware break even, but also eventually result in profit for every console sold. Sony may have finally achieved that, as we can now confirm that the platform holder has reduced the PS3’s RSX GPU to 40nm from its previous 65nm chip design.

The advantages of such a reduction are numerous. A 40 nano-meter chip results in reduced power usage, it’s less likely to overheat and will require less cooling. Though the Yellow Light of Death is not as common on PS3 Slims, the RSX’s new chip size will also reduce such risks, making the new model more reliable. It joins the current 45nm Cell processor. Here is the latest redesign — introducing the CECH-2100A:

100422_10

The CECH-2100A features a number of changes to join the RSX die shrinkage. As is expected, this model’s heatsink has been simplified in comparison to the CECH-2000A (PS3 Slim with the 65nm RSX). The new model’s power supply weighs 30g less at 412g and is quite a contrast to the original 60GB PS3’s 815g power supply. The console’s cooling unit has also seen a reduction in weight and size, at 408g compared to the CECH-2000A’s 545g. A number of adjoining chips around the RSX have been removed, no doubt resulting in significant cost reductions.

Japanese website PocketNews carried out the strip down, and also provided a number of power usage  comparisons with the previous 120GB PS3 Slim model. The results are as follows:

Model name:                              CECH-2000A        CECH-2100A

XMB Menu (Still wallpapers)             76W                         67W
XMB Menu (Main Theme)                 83-86W                     71W
FFXIII game event scene                 96-107W                 78-83W

FFXIII game menu                             83-84W                     74W
BD playback                                        88-91W                   77-78W
Power Off (Remote Play Stand-by)    9W                            9W

A significant reduction of approximately 15 per cent. In comparison, the original 60GB PS3 beast consumed a massive 160W when playing Blu-rays. Averaging under 80W even when playing a game, this new PS3 model will make your wallet happy. In 2007 the situation looked like this:

image

So although this new PS3 Slim won’t compete with the Nintendo Wii, the machine has certainly come some way. Not only will the new model reduce costs for Sony, it’ll reduce energy costs for you. Not bad.

[UPDATE] – Sony has confirmed with PocketNews that the RSX graphics chip is now 40nm, rather than the previously reported 45nm. The story has been updated to reflect this information.

88 Comments
  • hacker13sacker
    April 22, 2010
    #1

    another reason why ps3 owns all

  • wat?
    April 22, 2010
    #2

    9W in Stand-by? Wat?

  • Moocows111111
    April 22, 2010
    #3

    Cool now they’ll start to profit, then hopefully they make a good system in the next generation. I’m betting that the sequel to the Wii will have a Ps3 type of power due to its success.

  • MisterAV
    April 22, 2010
    #4

    9W in standby probably because it has the remote play with that feature that auto turn on the console. So it must stay online.

  • Patrick Steen
    April 22, 2010
    #5

    Any electrical item that is on stand-by is using power. TVs, Microwaves, anything. That’s why you should turn things off by the plug. Old CRT TV’s used to take up around 20W just in stand-by.

  • KillAll
    April 22, 2010
    #6

    Yet not one shred of evidence or proof that Sony is making anything or even breaking even on these. People just assume that the die is now smaller = profit!

    Lets actually wait for proof of this break even/profit talk instead of just pulling it out of thin air.

  • LC
    April 22, 2010
    #7

    This is old news! Test were run on the slim hardware months ago. Sony also confirmed this at the time of the ps3 slim launch. Even print magazines have reported this. It was a Huge selling point… 33% slimmer, 36% lighter, 34% less power.

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10318727-1.html

    among others… seriously. The ps3 slim was cracked open before you guys even unboxed a retail ps3 slim. welcome to last year patrick. Have a nice day in your time warp dude.

  • Patrick Steen
    April 22, 2010
    #8

    LC: This is the latest PS3 Slim model. The first PS3 Slim included a 45nm CPU, but not a 45nm GPU. These Slim models have yet to make their way into worldwide stores. The original Slim resulted in a power reduction of around 50% – which I wrote about when the console released. This new redesign results in a FURTHER 15% power reduction to that Slim.

    This is why I have included a table comparing this new model with the previous slim model. I urge you to carefully read content before criticising it. Good to see a link to CNET, I used to write for them. Thank you, come again.

  • lolz
    April 22, 2010
    #9

    LC got pwned. lolz.

  • Dr. Moogle
    April 22, 2010
    #10

    hmmmmm i like how sony is always finding little ways to reduce things like this……idk. its just nice to know eh?

  • TRF
    April 22, 2010
    #11

    So finally Sony can make bank on their Slim models. That’s awesome, Sony has really outdone themselves with the PS3.

    Funny thing worth mentioning, when i saw the thumbnail for this article in the top left corner of the forums, I thought it was an overview of a level in 3D Dot Game Heroes.

  • jammy
    April 22, 2010
    #12

    @KillAll

    Sony said last year that there are two hardware revisions for 2010.One in spring will break even,the one in late 2010 will make profit at it’s current price.

  • taus90
    April 22, 2010
    #13

    Everything in the article is great news only the place where it states Ylod, IMO its even uncommon for a Phat or launch PS3 to have YLOD, Its all about caring ur product. But i have agree that Fat bastard sucks up whole lot of electricity

  • Gringo
    April 22, 2010
    #14

    Wow, the PS3 inside looks very simple… Is really necessary that dome-like caparace? If it is as thin as it looks they could reduce the size even more don’t you think?

  • Patrick Steen
    April 23, 2010
    #15

    Gringo, there’s quite a lot more than the board – like the fan, cooling system, Blu-ray drive. It’s still a tight fit.

  • scottspeed
    April 24, 2010
    #16

    wow 9 watts on standby, no wonder my parents are always going on at me to turn it off at the wall

  • ArmV
    April 26, 2010
    #17

    Any idea when we can expect to see these in stores?

  • Patrick Steen
    April 26, 2010
    #18

    They should be trickling in now. They are already out in Japan. Sony may be able to ramp up production now, following their previous struggles.

    Also to others – note that the 9W is for remote play standby.

  • Botn3ivik
    April 26, 2010
    #19

    LOL pc uses 209w? only my gfx alone uses 340w.. (sony is retarded)

  • LC
    April 26, 2010
    #20

    lol owned indeed. my bad patrick. *shrugs*

  • Patrick Steen
    April 26, 2010
    #21

    No hard feelings =) and look, even CNET has reported on it: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20003418-1.html They credited the wrong source though.

  • Sydney
    April 26, 2010
    #22

    When is the new 45nm PS3 slim mark 2 coming out? 2010?

    Thanks.

  • hugh
    May 2, 2010
    #23

    The given nm is not the chip-size but the feature-size on the chip. The chip-size is like 10+ mm x 10+ mm.

  • Pep
    May 5, 2010
    #24

    Patrick, how can I know if I’m buying a CECH-2000A or a CECH-2100A? Thanks in advance! : D

  • Fecker
    May 12, 2010
    #25

    Patrick, how can I know if I’m buying a CECH-2000A or a CECH-2100A? Thanks in advance! : D [2]

  • Patrick Steen
    May 12, 2010
    #26

    If the number is not written on the box itself, you should be able to see on the PlayStation. It’s best to ask the retailer – and explain why you want to know.

  • Fecker
    May 12, 2010
    #27

    Thanks Patrick, I from Brazil, I hope that it will not take long to get here.

  • tbroc
    May 12, 2010
    #28

    I have noticed in my city no place is carrying any PS3…I am wondering if it has to do with this redesign. Anyone in the US purchased on of these yet ?

  • Patrick Steen
    May 16, 2010
    #29

    It will take some time for the increased manufacturing of these new models. They have been confirmed to be stocked in a number of US retailers.

  • xtreeme
    May 22, 2010
    #30

    Odd Ill have to check my reciept I thought bought my ps3 slim in march from walmart. The box says cech-2001

    Is that possible? They only had 3 units and said they were selling so fast they never had any in back since the price was $300 now.

    Xbox 360s were on lot of shelves. Could it be sony sent them units early because of the sales walmart had?

Leave a Reply:




Recent Posts Latest Comments Polls

Which Collector's Edition has you most excited?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Top Users